Unosquare.ModelValidation 1.0.0-alpha.4

This is a prerelease version of Unosquare.ModelValidation.
dotnet add package Unosquare.ModelValidation --version 1.0.0-alpha.4                
NuGet\Install-Package Unosquare.ModelValidation -Version 1.0.0-alpha.4                
This command is intended to be used within the Package Manager Console in Visual Studio, as it uses the NuGet module's version of Install-Package.
<PackageReference Include="Unosquare.ModelValidation" Version="1.0.0-alpha.4" />                
For projects that support PackageReference, copy this XML node into the project file to reference the package.
paket add Unosquare.ModelValidation --version 1.0.0-alpha.4                
#r "nuget: Unosquare.ModelValidation, 1.0.0-alpha.4"                
#r directive can be used in F# Interactive and Polyglot Notebooks. Copy this into the interactive tool or source code of the script to reference the package.
// Install Unosquare.ModelValidation as a Cake Addin
#addin nuget:?package=Unosquare.ModelValidation&version=1.0.0-alpha.4&prerelease

// Install Unosquare.ModelValidation as a Cake Tool
#tool nuget:?package=Unosquare.ModelValidation&version=1.0.0-alpha.4&prerelease                

A Flexible Model Validation Library

An easy-to-use formatter, validator and postprocessor for user input management.

NuGet

Motivation

The standard and documented model validation techniques are typically quite inflexible (in my view). If you look at <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/mvc/models/validation?view=aspnetcore-7.0"> the documentation</a>, you will notice a few things:

  1. Model validation is mostly based on property attributes
  2. Adding custom validation requires the implamentation of a ValidationAttribute and the scope of the validation logic tends to be limited. For example, validating if a user exists may require a call to a database or an API. While this is possible with the RemoteAttribute, it introduces unnecessary complexity.
  3. The default validation API does not support strongly-typed access to the model.
  4. Adding validation to classes for which attributes you cannot modify (i.e. external libraries) does not feel streamlined.
  5. There is no bult-in functionality to format input and validate it once it has been formatted.
  6. Validation of only part of the model is not supported. It feels like an all-or-none approach that proves difficult in for example, wizard-oriented scenarios where multi-step data is stored in a single model.

Usage

Please look at the following usage examples below. Notice this API provides a much more flexible approach to validation than the default one. You can define multiple validators for any model class and you can manually change the results as you please.


// Assume the following model class.
public record Employee
{
    [Range(1, 10, ErrorMessage = "Unfortunately, this field '{0}' must have a value between {1} and {2}.")]
    public int Id { get; set; }

    public string Name { get; set; } = string.Empty;

    public string? Email { get; set; }
}

// Create a model validator (there is a non strongly-typed version that you can also use)
var validatior = new ModelValidator<Employee>();

// You can now add the existing validation attributes, either one property at a time:
validator.AddAttributes();

// or one by one (you can use string fro property names if you prefer)
validator.AddAttributes(r => r.Id);

// or add pre-built validation attributes
validator
    .AddRequired(r => r.Name)
    .AddEmail(r => r.Email);

// or clear existing validation logic and add ValidationAttribute instances without the need
// to modify the class.
validator.Remove(r => r.Id)
validator.AddAttribute(r => r.Id, () => new RangeAttribute(2, 20);

// And last but not least -- add totally custom input formatting and validation
validator.AddCustom(r => r.Id, config =>
{
    config
        .WithPreValidation((context, value) => 21)
        .WithValidation((context, value) =>
        {
            // you are welcome to make this call async
            return value == 21
                ? context.Pass()
                : context.Fail();
        })
        .WithPostValidation((context, value) => context.SetValue(value));
});

// now you can run your validator as follows:
var target = new Employee();
var validation = await validator.ValidateAsync(target); // there is a synchronous version as well.

// And get either individual results
if (validation.IsInvalid(r => r.Id))
    Console.WriteLine(validation.ErrorMessage(r => r.Id));

// or total model validation
if (validation.IsValid)
    Console.WriteLine("Your model is valid");

// or manually add errors external to the model validator
validation.Add("SomeField", "This is some manual error message");

// which then would make validation.IsValid, false
if (validation.IsValid)
    Console.WriteLine("Your model is valid");

Product Compatible and additional computed target framework versions.
.NET net7.0 is compatible.  net7.0-android was computed.  net7.0-ios was computed.  net7.0-maccatalyst was computed.  net7.0-macos was computed.  net7.0-tvos was computed.  net7.0-windows was computed.  net8.0 was computed.  net8.0-android was computed.  net8.0-browser was computed.  net8.0-ios was computed.  net8.0-maccatalyst was computed.  net8.0-macos was computed.  net8.0-tvos was computed.  net8.0-windows was computed. 
Compatible target framework(s)
Included target framework(s) (in package)
Learn more about Target Frameworks and .NET Standard.

NuGet packages

This package is not used by any NuGet packages.

GitHub repositories

This package is not used by any popular GitHub repositories.

Version Downloads Last updated
1.0.0-alpha.4 83 10/7/2023
1.0.0-alpha.3 79 9/29/2023
1.0.0-alpha.2 69 9/29/2023
1.0.0-alpha.1 71 9/26/2023

Please review the examples in the repo for usage.