Motiv 3.0.0

Suggested Alternatives

Motiv 3.1.0

There is a newer version of this package available.
See the version list below for details.
dotnet add package Motiv --version 3.0.0                
NuGet\Install-Package Motiv -Version 3.0.0                
This command is intended to be used within the Package Manager Console in Visual Studio, as it uses the NuGet module's version of Install-Package.
<PackageReference Include="Motiv" Version="3.0.0" />                
For projects that support PackageReference, copy this XML node into the project file to reference the package.
paket add Motiv --version 3.0.0                
#r "nuget: Motiv, 3.0.0"                
#r directive can be used in F# Interactive and Polyglot Notebooks. Copy this into the interactive tool or source code of the script to reference the package.
// Install Motiv as a Cake Addin
#addin nuget:?package=Motiv&version=3.0.0

// Install Motiv as a Cake Tool
#tool nuget:?package=Motiv&version=3.0.0                

Motiv

Turn your if-statements into why statements

Motiv is a .NET library that supercharges the experience of working with boolean logic.

It allows you to package your boolean expressions into strongly typed propositions. By propositions, we mean a declarative statement that can be evaluated to either true or false.

such as:

  • the sun is shining
  • email address is missing an @ symbol
  • the subscription is within a grace period

In Motiv, propositions can evaluate models to determine if they are satisfied (or not), or be easily combined with others to form new propositions.

var isUsefulLibrary = hasExplanations & hasCustomMetadata & isReusable & isComposable;

if (isUsefulLibrary.IsSatisfiedBy(new MyCriteria()))
{
    ...

When you evaluate a proposition, you get back a BooleanResultBase object that tells you whether the proposition was satisfied (or not), as well as other useful information.

var result = isUsefulLibrary.IsSatisfiedBy(new InferiorAlternative());

result.Satisfied; // false
result.Reason; // "no support for explanations & no support for custom metadata"
result.Assertions; // ["no support for explanations", "no support for custom metadata"]

Only those propositions that helped determine the outcome will be used to generate the Reason and Assertions properties.

What can I use the Motiv for?

Motiv is not focused on catering to any particular use-case - except maybe to make the developers' life better. It is, however, inspired them:

  • User feedback - You require an application to provide detailed and accurate feedback to the user about why a certain decisions were made.
  • Debugging - Quickly understand why a certain condition was met (or not). When faced with deeply nested if-else statements it can be challenging to comprehend the bigger picture. Motiv gives you the wherewithal to separate the implementation details from the big-picture logical expression.
  • Multilingual support - Use custom POCO objects instead of strings to provide multi-language support.
  • Decomposing complex logic or domain rules - Whether you are faithfully modelling domain logic, or just trying to decompose an unwieldy logical expression, Motiv can help you to break it down into more manageable and understandable parts.+
  • Validation - The metadata can be used to provide human-readable explanations of why a certain validation rule was not met. This can be useful in scenarios where you need to provide feedback to the user about why a certain input was not valid.
  • Parsing CLI arguments - The command line arguments array can be interrogated and mapped to state objects (metadata) to help conditionally drive behavior in the application.

Usage

The following example is a basic demonstration of how to use Motiv. It shows how to create a basic proposition and then use it to determine if a number is negative or not.

Basic proposition

A basic proposition can be created using the Spec class. This class provides a fluent API for creating a logical proposition.

var isEligibleForLoan =
    Spec.Build((Customer customer) => 
                    customer.CreditScore > 600 &&
                    customer.Balance > 5000)
        .Create("is eligible for loan");

This can then be evaluated by calling the IsSatisfiedBy() method and passing in a model to evaluate.

var result = isEligibleForLoan.IsSatisfiedBy(eligibleCustomer);

result.Satisfied; // true
result.Reason; // "is eligible for loan"
result.Assertions; // "is eligible for loan"

When negated, a basic proposition will return a reason prefixed with a ! character. This is useful for debugging purposes.

var result = isEligibleForLoan.IsSatisfiedBy(uneligibleCustomer); 

result.Satisfied; // false
result.Reason; // "!is eligible for loan"
result.Assertions; // ["!is eligible for loan"]

Propositions with explanations

You can also use the WhenTrue() and WhenFalse() methods to provide a more human-readable description for when the outcome is either true or false. These values will be used in the Reason and Assertions properties of the result.

var isNegative =
    Spec.Build((int n) => n < 0)
        .WhenTrue("the number is negative")
        .WhenFalse("the number is not negative")
        .Create();

var result = isNegative.IsSatisfiedBy(-3);

result.Satisfied; // true
result.Reason; // "the number is negative"
result.Assertions; // ["the number is negative"]

Propositions with attached metadata

You are also not limited to strings. You can equally supply any POCO object, and it will be yielded when appropriate.

var isNegative =
    Spec.Build((int n) => n < 0)
        .WhenTrue(new MyMetadata("the number is negative"))
        .WhenFalse(new MyMetadata("the number is not negative"))
        .Create("is negative")

var result = isNegative.IsSatisfiedBy(-3);

result.Satisfied; // true
result.Reason; // "is negative"
result.Assertions; // ["is negative"]
result.Metadata; // [{ Message = "the number is negative" }]

Combining propositions

The real power of Motiv comes from combining propositions to form new ones. The library will take care of collating the underlying causes and filter out irrelevant and inconsequential assertions and metadata from the final result. propositions can be combined using the &,| and ^ operators as well as the supplemental .OrElse() and .AndAlso() methods.

var hasValidTicketProposition =
    Spec.Build((Passenger passenger) => passenger.HasValidTicket)
        .WhenTrue("has a valid ticket")
        .WhenFalse("does not have a valid ticket")
        .Create();

var hasOutstandingFeesProposition =
    Spec.Build((Passenger passenger) => passenger.OutstandingFees > 0)
        .WhenTrue("has outstanding fees")
        .WhenFalse("does not have outstanding fees")
        .Create();

var isCheckInOpenProposition =
    Spec.Build((Passenger passenger) =>
        passenger.FlightTime - DateTime.Now <= TimeSpan.FromHours(4) &&
        passenger.FlightTime - DateTime.Now >= TimeSpan.FromMinutes(30))
            .WhenTrue("check-in is open")
            .WhenFalse("check-in is closed")
            .Create();

var canCheckInProposition = hasValidTicketProposition & !hasOutstandingFeesProposition & isCheckInOpenProposition;

var result = canCheckInProposition.IsSatisfiedBy(validPassenger);

result.Satisfied; // true
result.Reason; // "has a valid ticket & does not have outstanding fees & check-in is open"
result.Assertions; // ["has a valid ticket", "does not have outstanding fees", "check-in is open"]

When combining propositions to form new ones, only the propositions that helped determine the final result will be included in the Assertions property and Reason property.

var result = isPositiveAndOddProposition.IsSatisfiedBy(-3);

result.Satisfied; // returns false
result.Reason; // "is negative"
result.Assertions; // ["the number is negative"]

Encapsulation and Re-use

Redefining propositions

Sometimes an existing propositions do not produce the desired assertions or metadata. In this case, you will need to wrap the existing proposition in a new one.

var underlying = 
    Spec.Build((int n) => n < 0)
        .WhenTrue(new MyMetadata("the number is negative"))
        .WhenFalse(new MyMetadata("the number is not negative"))
        .Create("is negative (metadata)");

var isNegative =
    Spec.Build(underlying)
        .WhenTrue("the number is negative")
        .WhenFalse("the number is not negative")
        .Create("is negative (explanation)");
Strongly typed proposition

You will likely want to encapsulate propositions for reuse across an application. For this you typically have two options, which is to either return Spec instances from members of POCO objects, or to derive from the Spec<TModel> or Spec<TModel, TMetadata> class (the former being merely syntactic sugar for Spec<TModel, string>). Using these classes will help you to maintain a separation of concerns and also raise the conspicuity of important logic within an application.

public class IsNegativeProposition : Spec<int>(
    Spec.Build((int n) => n < 0)
        .WhenTrue("the number is negative")
        .WhenFalse("the number is not negative")
        .Create());

public class IsNegativeMultiLingualProposition : Spec<int, MyMetadata>(
    Spec.Build((int n) => n < 0)
        .WhenTrue(new MyMetadata { Spanish = "el número es negativo" })
        .WhenFalse(new MyMetadata { Spanish = "el número no es negativo" })
        .Create("is negative"));

If you require (or prefer) your proposition to be expressed as multiple statements you can define them within a factory method.

public class IsPositiveAndOddProposition : Spec<int>(() => 
    {
        var isNegative =
            Spec.Build((int n) => n < 0)
                .Create("is negative");+

        var isEven =
            Spec.Build((int n) => n % 2 == 0)
                .Create("is even"); 

        return !isNegative & !isEven;
    });

Higher Order Logic

To perform logic over collections of models, higher order logical operations are required. This library provides a .As() builder method that allows you to define your own higher order logical operations. Some built-in higher order logical operations are provided for popular operations, but you can also add your own using extension methods.

The current built-in higher order logical operations are:

  • AsAllSatisfied(): Creates a proposition that yields a true boolean-result object if all the models in a collection satisfy the proposition, otherwise a false boolean-result object is returned.
  • AsAnySatisfied(): Creates a proposition that yields a true boolean-result object if any of the models in a collection satisfy the proposition, otherwise a false boolean-result object is returned.
  • AsNoneSatisfied(): Creates a proposition that yields a true boolean-result object if none of the models in a collection satisfy the proposition, otherwise a false boolean-result object is returned.
  • AsNSatisfied(): Creates a proposition that yields a true boolean-result object if exactly N models in a collection satisfy the proposition, otherwise a false boolean-result object is returned.
  • AsAtLeastNSatisfied(): Creates a proposition that yields a true boolean-result object if at least N models in a collection satisfy the proposition, otherwise a false boolean-result object is returned.
  • AsAtMostfNSatisfied(): Creates a proposition that yields a true boolean-result object if at most N models in a collection satisfy the proposition, otherwise a false boolean-result object is returned.
Spec.Build((int n) => n < 0)
    .AsAllSatisfied()
    .WhenTrue("all are negative")
    .WhenFalse("some are not negative")
    .Create();

You can also use an existing proposition instead of a predicate to create a higher order logical operation. This will give you access to each result and model pair, which can be used to customize the output to a particular use-case.

Spec.Build(new IsNegativeIntegerProposition())
    .AsAllSatisfied()
    .WhenTrue("all are negative")
    .WhenFalse(evaluation => evaluation.FalseModels.Select(n => $"{n} is not negative"))
    .Create();

When dynamically generating assertions/metadata, you are provided with an evaluation object that contains pre-defined properties that can be used to customize the output (such as TrueModels, FalseModels, TrueCount, FalseCount etc.). This is to facilitate pattern matching using switch expressions, which results in more readable inline conditional checks.

var allNegative =
    Spec.Build(new IsNegativeIntegerProposition())
        .AsAllSatisfied()
        .WhenTrue(eval => eval switch
        {
            { Count: 0 } => "there is an absence of numbers",
            { Models: [< 0 and var n] } => $"{n} is negative and is the only number",
            _ => "all are negative numbers"
        })
        .WhenFalse(eval => eval switch
        {
            { Models: [0] } => ["the number is 0 and is the only number"],
            { Models: [> 0 and var n] } => [$"{n} is positive and is the only number"],
            { NoneSatisfied: true } when eval.Models.All(m => m is 0) => ["all are 0"],
            { NoneSatisfied: true } when eval.Models.All(m => m > 0) => ["all are positive numbers"],
            { NoneSatisfied: true } =>  ["none are negative numbers"],
            _ => eval.FalseResults.GetAssertions()
        })
        .Create("all are negative");

allNegative.IsSatisfiedBy([]).Assertions; // ["there is an absence of numbers"]
allNegative.IsSatisfiedBy([-10]).Assertions; // ["-10 is negative and is the only number"]
allNegative.IsSatisfiedBy([-2, -4, -6, -8]).Assertions; // ["all are negative numbers"]
allNegative.IsSatisfiedBy([0]).Assertions; // ["the number is 0 and is the only number"]
allNegative.IsSatisfiedBy([11]).Assertions; // ["11 is positive and is the only number"]
allNegative.IsSatisfiedBy([0, 0, 0, 0]).Assertions; // ["all are 0"]
allNegative.IsSatisfiedBy([2, 4, 6, 8]).Assertions; // ["all are positive numbers"]
allNegative.IsSatisfiedBy([0, 1, 2, 3]).Assertions; // ["none are negative numbers"]
allNegative.IsSatisfiedBy([-2, -4, 0, 9]).Assertions; // ["0 is not negative", "9 is not negative"]

Tradeoffs

There are inevitably potential tradeoffs to consider when using this library.

  1. Performance: This library is designed to be as performant as possible, but it is still a layer of abstraction over the top of your logic. This means that there is a measurable performance cost to using it. However, this cost is negligible in most cases and is generally eclipsed by the benefits it provides.
  2. Dependency: This library is a dependency that you will have to manage. Once embedded in your codebase it will be challenging to remove. However, this library does not itself depend on any third-party libraries, so it does not bring any unexpected baggage with it.
  3. Learning Curve: For many, this library is a new approach and will nonetheless require a bit of familiarization. That being said, it has been deliberately designed to be as intuitive and easy to use as possible—there is relatively little to learn.

Getting Started with CLI

This section provides instructions on how to build and run the Motiv project using the .NET Core CLI, which is a powerful and flexible way to work with .NET projects.

Prerequisites
  • Ensure you have the .NET SDK installed on your machine.
  • Clone the repository to your local machine.
Building the Project
  1. Open Terminal or Command Prompt: Navigate to the directory where you cloned the Motiv repository.
  2. Navigate to the Project Directory: If the solution file (.sln) is not in the root, navigate to the directory containing the solution file.
  3. Build the Solution: Run the following command to build the solution:
    dotnet build
    
Running Tests

Run Unit Tests To execute tests within the solution run the following command:

dotnet test

Contribution

Your contributions to Motiv are greatly appreciated:

Branching Strategy

 main
    This is the primary branch of the repository. It should always be stable and deployable. 

 develop
    Merged into: main
    Purpose: This branch serves as an integration branch for features. Once a feature is complete, it is merged 
    into develop.  When develop is stable and ready for a release, its contents are merged into main.

 feature/
    Created from: develop
    Merged back into: develop
    Naming convention: feature/ followed by a descriptive name (e.g., feature/add-login)
    Purpose: Used for developing new features. Each feature should have its own branch.

Workflow Summary

Start a new feature by creating a feature/ branch off develop.
Once the feature is complete, create a pull request to merge it back into develop.
Regularly merge develop into release branches for preparing releases.

Additional Notes

Delete branches post-merge to keep the repository clean.
Use pull requests for code review and ensure CI checks pass before merging.
Regularly update branches with the latest changes from their parent branch to avoid large merge conflicts.

This strategy helps in maintaining a clean and manageable workflow, ensuring stability in the main branch, and enabling continuous development and quick fixes as needed.

License

MIT License

Copyright (c) 2023 karlssberg

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

Product Compatible and additional computed target framework versions.
.NET net5.0 was computed.  net5.0-windows was computed.  net6.0 was computed.  net6.0-android was computed.  net6.0-ios was computed.  net6.0-maccatalyst was computed.  net6.0-macos was computed.  net6.0-tvos was computed.  net6.0-windows was computed.  net7.0 was computed.  net7.0-android was computed.  net7.0-ios was computed.  net7.0-maccatalyst was computed.  net7.0-macos was computed.  net7.0-tvos was computed.  net7.0-windows was computed.  net8.0 is compatible.  net8.0-android was computed.  net8.0-browser was computed.  net8.0-ios was computed.  net8.0-maccatalyst was computed.  net8.0-macos was computed.  net8.0-tvos was computed.  net8.0-windows was computed. 
.NET Core netcoreapp2.0 was computed.  netcoreapp2.1 was computed.  netcoreapp2.2 was computed.  netcoreapp3.0 was computed.  netcoreapp3.1 was computed. 
.NET Standard netstandard2.0 is compatible.  netstandard2.1 was computed. 
.NET Framework net461 was computed.  net462 was computed.  net463 was computed.  net47 was computed.  net471 was computed.  net472 was computed.  net48 was computed.  net481 was computed. 
MonoAndroid monoandroid was computed. 
MonoMac monomac was computed. 
MonoTouch monotouch was computed. 
Tizen tizen40 was computed.  tizen60 was computed. 
Xamarin.iOS xamarinios was computed. 
Xamarin.Mac xamarinmac was computed. 
Xamarin.TVOS xamarintvos was computed. 
Xamarin.WatchOS xamarinwatchos was computed. 
Compatible target framework(s)
Included target framework(s) (in package)
Learn more about Target Frameworks and .NET Standard.

NuGet packages

This package is not used by any NuGet packages.

GitHub repositories

This package is not used by any popular GitHub repositories.